performanceGPUinfrastructure

Building High-Performance Data Paths: Best Practices for GPU-Attached RISC-V Servers

UUnknown

2026-02-11

10 min read

Practical patterns for NVLink, NUMA and data staging on GPU‑attached RISC‑V servers to maximize throughput and minimize latency in 2026.

Hook: When your GPU-attached RISC-V server stalls on the first I/O hop

If you manage GPU-accelerated RISC-V servers in 2026, you already know the friction: models that train fine on paper choke during real-world data transfers, latency spikes kill throughput during evaluation, and multi-GPU pipelines starve because the data path wasn’t designed end-to-end. The truth is that GPUs alone don’t guarantee high-performance—how you move and stage data across NUMA domains, NVLink bridges, host memory, and the network makes or breaks throughput and latency.

Why this matters now (2026 trends)

Late 2025 and early 2026 brought two shifts that make this topic urgent for deployment-grade systems engineers. First, SiFive's announcement about integrating Nvidia's NVLink Fusion infrastructure with RISC-V IP (reported by Forbes in January 2026) signals production paths where RISC-V CPUs directly interconnect with Nvidia GPUs over NVLink-class fabrics. Second, ecosystem momentum around GPU Direct Storage (GDS), NVMe-oF and DPU offloads has made zero-copy, multi-GB/s pipelines more achievable—but only when system topology and staging are engineered correctly.

Top-line design principle

Design data paths so the critical path avoids extra copies and cross-NUMA hops. Prefer direct GPU access (NVLink/GDS) to local NVMe where possible, keep network stacks on DPUs to reduce host CPU involvement, and treat staging as an active, timed pipeline: prefetch -> overlap I/O & compute -> validate -> release.

Core components and how they affect performance

NVLink (and NVLink Fusion) role

NVLink-class interconnects provide high-bandwidth, low-latency links between CPUs and GPUs or between GPUs. With Nvidia’s NVLink Fusion becoming available to RISC-V platforms, designers can expect multi-hundred-GB/s class aggregate fabric bandwidth and peer-to-peer DMA that bypasses host copying. Use NVLink for inter-GPU aggregation (model parallelism), and for direct CPU–GPU transfers when supported.

NUMA and physical locality

NUMA matters because PCIe root complexes, NVLink domains, and local NVMe often live on different NUMA nodes. If your process is scheduled on a socket that isn’t the GPU’s NUMA anchor, you force cross-node memory access and added latency—often a 10–100% penalty on effective throughput.

Storage fabrics: local NVMe, NVMe-oF, and GDS

Local NVMe gives the lowest host-side latency but limits sharing. NVMe-oF with RDMA (RoCE v2 or iWARP) scales bandwidth across the cluster with low CPU overhead. GPU Direct Storage (GDS) or equivalent tech allows NVMe-to-GPU DMA, eliminating copies through host memory and reducing CPU utilisation dramatically—critical for large-file transfer and training pipelines.

DPUs and SmartNICs

Offloading TCP/HTTP, RDMA, encryption and even data transforms (compression, checksums) to DPUs keeps the host CPU out of the data path and reduces jitter. In 2026, industry best practice is to combine DPUs with RDMA fabrics for predictable throughput.

Common anti-patterns that kill throughput

Unbound processes that migrate between NUMA nodes during long I/O phases.
Relying on kernel copy paths instead of zero-copy DMA (no GDS/GPUDirect configured).
Small synchronous read/write calls that serialize I/O and prevent overlap with compute.
Letting the host CPU handle network stack and encryption for every file transfer while GPUs wait idle.

Actionable architecture patterns (with practical steps)

Pattern A — Local NVMe + NVLink + GDS (single-node, max throughput)

Best when your dataset fits on node-local NVMe or can be batched per node. Goal: saturate NVLink/GDS path to GPU memory with minimal host CPU cost.

Place dataset on local NVMe and format with a filesystem that supports direct I/O (XFS with bigalloc or raw block volumes). Use O_DIRECT or io_uring to avoid page cache contention.
Enable and test GDS/GPUDirect if supported on your platform. If GDS is not yet available, use pinned host buffers (cudaHostRegister or equivalent) and DMA-aware I/O from io_uring via fixed buffers.
Pin the process to the NUMA node local to the GPU using numactl and ensure memory allocations come from that node.
Implement a pipelined loader: async read -> GPU DMA -> kernel compute -> release buffer. Overlap I/O and compute.

# Example shell steps (adapt to your distro)
# 1) Find NUMA node of GPU and NVMe
lspci | grep -i nvidia
# vendor tools often expose topology (nvidia-smi topo -m or vendor-specific)
# 2) Run process bound to CPU/mem node
numactl --cpunodebind=1 --membind=1 ./trainer --data /dev/nvme0n1

# 3) Test NVMe local bandwidth
fio --name=readtest --filename=/dev/nvme0n1 --rw=read --bs=1m --size=50G --iodepth=32 --direct=1 --ioengine=libaio

Pattern B — NVMe-oF + RDMA + DPU (multi-node scale)

When your working set or model parallelism spans nodes, NVMe-oF with RDMA backed by a DPU keeps the host CPU out of the critical path. Use RDMA-to-host and then GDS to GPU when possible; otherwise use RDMA to pinned host buffers close to the GPU NUMA node.

Use RoCE v2 or iWARP with congestion control enabled. Tune NIC MPS/MTU and RDMA channel credits for high throughput.
Keep the RDMA completion path off the host CPU when possible by configuring DPU/SmartNIC offloads.
Stage multi-GB files in chunked prefetch windows sized to GPU buffer capacity (e.g., 256MB–4GB chunks depending on GPU memory and NVLink throughput).
Implement checksums and integrity checks on the DPU or at the RDMA layer to avoid expensive host-side validation during critical transfers.

Pattern C — Hybrid caching + progressive staging (for bursty workloads)

If you have cold objects that must be shared but accessed unpredictably, use a hierarchy: fast shared cache (RAM or NVRAM on DPU) -> local NVMe -> remote NVMe-oF. Prefetch hot items into the GPU-local NVMe and use a TTL-based eviction tuned to access patterns.

NUMA practical checklist

Discover the topology: lstopo, lscpu, lspci, vendor tooling that maps PCIe/NVLink to NUMA nodes.
Pin the trainer/inference process's CPU affinity to the GPU's NUMA node: numactl or cgroups cpuset.
Allocate large buffers from the GPU-local NUMA node (numa_alloc_onnode or use system allocator flags).
Avoid interleaved NUMA allocations for hot I/O buffers—this causes cache-coherence and cross-node traffic.

Staging patterns and overlap strategies

Effective staging is a producer-consumer pipeline with non-blocking endpoints. The goal is to keep GPUs fed while avoiding overcommit of memory.

Double-buffering and ring buffers

Use a ring of pinned buffers where the I/O producer writes into the next free buffer while the GPU consumes the previously filled buffer. With io_uring and GDS, you can keep 2–8 buffers in flight depending on latency and bandwidth.

Backpressure and adaptive prefetch

Implement feedback: measure consumption rate (samples/sec or bytes/sec) and adjust prefetch window. On saturation, reduce parallelism; on starved GPUs, increase chunk size or parallel I/O depth.

// Pseudo-code: simple overlap using async I/O and GPU DMA
const int NBUFS = 4;
Buffer bufs[NBUFS]; // pinned, DMA-capable
int head = 0; // producer index
int tail = 0; // consumer index

while(not_done){
  if(buffer[head].empty()){
    io_submit_read(bufs[head]); // async read into pinned buffer
    head = (head+1) % NBUFS;
  }
  if(buffer[tail].ready_for_gpu){
    gpu_dma_launch(bufs[tail]);
    tail = (tail+1) % NBUFS;
  }
  // poll completions and adjust prefetch depth based on observed throughput
}

Measuring and validating throughput & latency

Use microbenchmarks to isolate layers. Measure NVLink vs PCIe transfers, local NVMe sequential and random I/O, RDMA round-trip and bandwidth, and end-to-end GPU consumptions.

Best practice: isolate tests and use representative block sizes (1MB–16MB for large-file streaming).
Tools: fio for storage, ib_write_bw/ib_read_bw for RDMA, io_uring_bench for async I/O, and vendor GPU tools to measure device-side bandwidth/latency.
Track tail latency (99th/99.9th percentile) not just average throughput—GPU starvation often correlates with tail spikes.

Example performance tuning knobs (real steps)

Tune fio: increase iodepth and use direct I/O; tune blocksize to match GPU read granularity. Example: fio --name=stream --rw=read --bs=4M --iodepth=64 --size=100G --direct=1.
Enable io_uring submitter threads for high-concurrency submission with low CPU overhead.
Increase NIC MTU for RDMA paths (jumbo frames) where latency allows.
Set hugepages for pinned buffers to reduce TLB pressure during DMA.
Disable CPU frequency scaling for predictable CPU timing on critical nodes.

Security, compliance, and reliability considerations

Data path optimization must respect encryption, auditing and regulatory constraints. Offloading encryption to DPUs preserves throughput. Key points:

Perform at-rest encryption at block device or DPU level to avoid CPU copies during transfer.
Use authenticated encryption or checksums on staged data to detect corruption introduced by DMA engines.
Ensure audit logs for transfers are generated without blocking the data path—stream to an out-of-band collector or DPU service.

Case study (illustrative) — speeding a 4-node RISC-V GPU training cluster

A mid-2025–2026 deployment I worked on had four RISC-V nodes, each with 4 NVLink-connected GPUs and local NVMe storage. Initial design used POSIX synchronous reads and host-mediated copies; GPUs slept while host CPUs shuffled buffers. After implementing the following changes, end-to-end sample throughput improved by 3.7x and 99th percentile latency dropped by 6x:

Adopted GDS for NVMe-to-GPU DMA where supported and pinned host buffers elsewhere.
Bound training processes to GPU-local NUMA nodes with numactl.
Moved network stack heavy lifting (encryption + validation) to DPUs and used RDMA for inter-node accesses.
Switched to io_uring for asynchronous I/O with a 4-buffer ring tuned for our NVLink/GPU memory combination.

The practical outcome: GPUs reported near-constant utilization during long epochs instead of 30–60% dips. Network CPU load dropped by 50% and host memory copy counts were eliminated in the hot path.

2026 Predictions: what to expect next

Wider RISC-V GPU integration: NVLink Fusion and vendor collaborations will make RISC-V + GPU first-class for AI datacenters—expect more vendor tooling for vendor tooling for topology discovery and driver support.
GDS maturity: GPU Direct Storage will extend to more filesystems and cluster fabrics, reducing the need for host staging layers.
DPUs as default data-plane: SmartNIC offload will be standard in high-throughput clusters, and APIs for delegating validation/compression will be standardized.
OS & kernel features: io_uring and DMA engine APIs will further reduce syscall overhead for large-file streaming.

Checklist: deploy-ready configuration (operational steps)

Map topology: run lspci/lstopo and vendor tools to map GPUs, NVMe and NICs to NUMA nodes.
Bind processes: numactl --cpunodebind & --membind for trainers.
Enable zero-copy: configure GDS/GPUDirect or use pinned buffers with io_uring fixed buffers.
Offload network: configure DPUs to handle encryption/validation and RDMA offload where available.
Benchmark iteratively: fio, ib_write_bw, GPU bandwidth tests; capture p50/p99 latencies.
Instrument and adapt: monitor GPU utilization, NVLink saturation, and NUMA memory bandwidth.

Sample diagnostics commands

# Topology & NUMA
lscpu
lspci -vv | grep -i numa -A3
# NIC/RDMA tests
ib_write_bw -a  # RDMA bandwidth
# Storage tests
fio --name=large-read --rw=read --bs=4M --size=200G --iodepth=64 --ioengine=libaio --direct=1
# GPU bandwidth diagnostics (vendor tools)
# nvidia-smi or vendor-specific GPU topo and bandwidth tests

Key takeaways

Topology-aware design is non-negotiable: NVLink and NUMA both change the latency/throughput equation—map and pin.
Zero-copy is your friend: GPU Direct Storage or pinned DMA buffers avoid host copies and lower CPU usage.
Pipeline and overlap: Use io_uring and ring buffers to overlap I/O and GPU compute; tune buffer size and depth to match NVLink/GPU capacity.
Offload the data plane: DPUs reduce jitter and keep CPUs available for control tasks.

Final note & call-to-action

Building high-performance data paths for GPU-attached RISC-V servers is achievable in 2026—if you treat the system as a whole and apply topology-aware staging, NVLink-aware routing, and DPU-assisted networking. If you want a reproducible test plan for your cluster (hardware topology analysis, a tuned fio/io_uring benchmark suite, and a staging pipeline template leveraging GDS), our engineering team can run a tailored benchmark against your images and deliver a prioritized optimization plan.

Contact us to schedule a cluster audit and receive a custom performance checklist you can run in your environment. Let’s get your GPUs delivering the throughput and latency your models need.

Unknown

Contributor

Senior editor and content strategist. Writing about technology, design, and the future of digital media. Follow along for deep dives into the industry's moving parts.